Integrating Machine Learning With Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing for Erosion Risk Mapping in The Tamalate Watershed

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ramdhan Olii
Sartan
Ririn
Isnaen
Erwin

Abstract

Soil erosion poses a significant threat to environmental sustainability, particularly in regions with complex topographic and hydrological characteristics. Accurate erosion risk mapping is essential for effective land management and mitigation strategies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of five machine learning models—Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Tree (GBT), Decision Tree (DT), Generalized Linear Model (GLM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—in predicting erosion risk using remote sensing-derived indices. Eight environmental variables, including topographic, hydrological, and vegetation indicators, were analyzed after confirming no harmful multicollinearity (VIF < 3). Model performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy, AUC, precision, recall, and F-measure. Results show that RF achieved the highest predictive accuracy (0.727) and AUC (0.772), with topographic wetness index (TWI) and normalized difference moisture index (NDMI) being the most influential variables. Conversely, DT tended to overestimate high-risk areas due to overfitting, while SVM and GBT provided more balanced classifications. The spatial classification outcomes revealed that model structure significantly impacts risk distribution, with ensemble models offering more reliable results. Although recall and sensitivity were high across models, specificity was generally low, particularly in GLM and DT, indicating difficulty in detecting non-risk areas. The study highlights the importance of selecting appropriate machine learning approaches and integrating diverse environmental indicators. Future research should address class imbalance and incorporate additional biophysical and socio-economic variables to enhance model robustness and policy relevance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Olii, M. R., Nento, S., Pakaya, R., Isnaen Muhidin, M., & Anshari, E. (2025). Integrating Machine Learning With Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing for Erosion Risk Mapping in The Tamalate Watershed . Jurnal Teknik Sumber Daya Air, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56860/jtsda.v5i2.157
Section
Articles

References

J. Poesen, “Soil erosion in the Anthropocene: research needs,” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, vol. 43, no. 11, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4250.

P. Panagos, P. Borrelli, K. Meusburger, C. Alewell, E. Lugato, and L. Montanarella, “Estimating the soil erosion cover-management factor at the European scale,” Land use policy, vol. 48, pp. 38–50, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.05.021.

J. P. C. Eekhout and J. de Vente, “Global impact of climate change on soil erosion and potential for adaptation through soil conservation,” Earth-Science Rev., vol. 226, p. 103921, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2022.103921.

G. W. Woldemariam, A. D. Iguala, S. Tekalign, and R. Reddy, “Spatial Modeling of Soil Erosion Risk and Its Implication for Conservation Planning: the Case of the Gobele Watershed, East Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia,” Land, vol. 7, pp. 1–25, 2018, doi: 10.3390/LAND7010025.

I. Gaubi, A. Chaabani, A. Ben Mammou, and M. H. Hamza, “A GIS-based soil erosion prediction using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) (Lebna watershed, Cap Bon, Tunisia),” Nat. Hazards, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 219–239, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2684-3.

S. Issaka and M. A. Ashraf, “Impact of soil erosion and degradation on water quality: a review,” Geol. Ecol. Landscapes, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1080/24749508.2017.1301053.

A. El Jazouli, A. Barakat, A. Ghafiri, S. El Moutaki, A. Ettaqy, and R. Khellouk, “Soil erosion modeled with USLE, GIS, and remote sensing: a case study of Ikkour watershed in Middle Atlas (Morocco),” Geosci. Lett., vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s40562-017-0091-6.

P. Borrelli et al., “Land use and climate change impacts on global soil erosion by water (2015-2070),” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 117, no. 36, pp. 21994–22001, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001403117.

S. Zhong et al., “Machine Learning: New Ideas and Tools in Environmental Science and Engineering,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 12741–12754, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01339.

N. Arif, P. Danoedoro, and Hartono, “Analysis of Artificial Neural Network in Erosion Modeling: A Case Study of Serang Watershed,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Dec. 2017. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/98/1/012027.

O. Ghorbanzadeh et al., “Gully erosion susceptibility mapping (GESM) using machine learning methods optimized by the multi‑collinearity analysis and K-fold cross-validation,” Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1653–1678, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/19475705.2020.1810138.

S. S. Band et al., “Evaluating the efficiency of different regression, decision tree, and bayesian machine learning algorithms in spatial piping erosion susceptibility using alos/palsar data,” Land, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1–22, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/land9100346.

R. M. O’brien, “A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors,” Qual. Quant., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 673–690, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.

D. Fernández, E. Adermann, M. Pizzolato, R. Pechenkin, C. G. Rodríguez, and A. Taravat, “Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Soil Erosion Modelling Based on Remotely Sensed Data,” Remote Sens., vol. 15, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.3390/rs15020482.

D. R. Cutler et al., “Random Forests for Classification in Ecology,” Ecology, vol. 88, no. 11, pp. 2783–2792, 2007, doi: 10.1890/07-0539.1.

S. B. Kotsiantis, “Decision trees: a recent overview,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 261–283, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10462-011-9272-4.

N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE : Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 16, pp. 321–357, 2002, doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1106.1813.

L. Breiman, “Random Forest,” Mach. Lerning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

J. H. Friedman, “Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine,” Ann. Stat., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1189–1232, 2001, doi: 10.1214/aos/1013203451.